Here's an example of their manipulation:
"This week the New York Post carried a report that 1.5 million people had left high-tax New York state between 2000 and 2008, more than a million of them from even higher-tax New York City."
The implication made here and later in the article is that they left mostly because of taxes. However, they never justify that with a reason-for-leaving survey, etc. Maybe they left simply because they don't like crowds. WSJ simply runs with the tax-reason assumption. The WSJ does this often, as do most Murdoch-owned outlets. They either lack self-critical thinking, or are purposely duping readers with sales techniques such as pretending like something is already a fact when no such fact has been established by the brochure. They are not "serious" news.
No comments:
Post a Comment